
Being born and brought up at Kolkata, I was never really a part of the South Indian culture. Though I respect my native state of Andhra Pradesh, its rich heritage and an otherwise impeccable culture, there are certain customs that I have issues with. The prime amongst them is the issue of marrying your own relatives. A few years ago, my grandmother, being a woman of strictly traditional views, came up with the matrimonial proposal of my first cousin, Sanjay, for me. Sanjay is my father’s sister’s son. I have been seeing him since childhood and I have always viewed him as a brother. The very idea of marrying him was repulsive. Luckily, my parents could somehow convince my grandmother about the awkwardness of the proposal and stop her from negotiating further.
Marrying first cousins is a very common occurrence in not only Andhra Pradesh but in other States of South India as well. A more objectionable proposal can be marriage to your maternal uncle if agewise suitable. That means, a girl gets to marry her mother’s younger brother!
I don’t understand the rationale behind such match making but it is still widely prevalent in South India-even in the erudite class! You find highly educated people marrying within their close relatives. The question that can be uppermost in anybody’s mind is about the genetic health of kids born to such couples. Educated people like you and will reason out that the offsprings will have some kind of genetic deformity, but you’ll be surprised to know that most of these couples give birth to perfectly normal kids and some of them give birth to really brainy ones too.
In any case, I find marrying close relatives a highly disgusting concept. The only advantage of such marriage is that the family property remains intact.
And, I have already mentioned that such couples are producing normal children, but, you should know that genetic proximity and close blood relation often results in healthwise low quality offsprings( whether in humans or any other living beings). As Reshmi pointed out, complications arise while conception also.
Who told you that marrying within relatives produces handicapped children?
It doesn't, but inbreeding means that it shuts the door on genetic enhancement and increases the chances of keeping inherited genetic shortcomings within the family. This is science.
The term "blue blood" for aristocracy comes from the 'defective' blood (or blood related defects/deficiencies/ailments) that were found to be rampant in such families all over Europe.
Even animals don't mate with close relatives. They avoid it as much as possible. Due to extensive depletion of wildlife in many parts of the world, many species have chosen to inbreed when survival is at stake like the cheetahs in Africa. They now face a bleak future.
Here, I would like to share what I have personally seen. My friend’s dog was given for cross breeding and it produced strong offsprings. After that, a female from the offsprings was mated with the older dog (its father) and three of its five pups died in the first few days of their birth.
Even in the case of marriages within relatives it is seen that offsprings with maternal uncles had more health complications than the ones produced by marrying cousins.
This practice may be social approval, and as you correctly pointed out even Sati had social approval. Does that mean that we have to accept them? Rather we should evaluate the flawed social perceptions and correct them to the extent we can.
Johar, mass self immolation to save the honour, also did not have any religious sanctity.
Marrying the female of maternal side is a socially acceptable custom in South India, West India specially Maharashtra: and is frowned upon in East India, and unthinkable in Central and North India. The custom has religious sanctity from the times of Mahabharat days or earlier.
When Government of Maharashtra is proposing to legalise live in relationships; the attitude of certain people at instablogs is not understood.
For that matter, how would you feel if you are asked to marry your niece or cousin Mr. Balam? Sorry for posing this question again, but I am asking this question once again because I want you to experience how a person in that particular situation would feel.
You can ask the question thousand times or as many times as you wish. It is your annd my personal choice.
The pertinent question is whether the custom is bad or not. If yes, then how, why and what are the remedial measures and practical alternatives available to the society?
It does not become bad in South India just because North Indians don’t approve of it. That simply is my point.
As far as I know , people from the same gotra are prohibitted from being married because they are believed to be descendents of the same rishi like bharadwaj, vashishist etc. which makes them brother and sister.
My sister’s friend has married (arrainged) to her maternal uncle’s son. They are highly educated and live in US.
Well, so the ultimate reason behind all this is dowry? Thanks for insight.
Being a south indian myself I respect my culture in a lot of ways. But, its just that when someone is meant to be an uncle, psychologically you cannot imagine him as your spouse. Same goes with cousins also. you grow up with them, they are like your brothers.
http://leenakomarraju.instablogs.com/entry/the-south-indian-custom-of-marrying-maternal-uncles-a-further-viewpoint/
While the grandparents are happy, the couples in the current generations I see in most of the situations are not happy coz they want to look for the spouses from outside of their family network.
Local Opinions (47)
And, I have already mentioned that such couples are producing normal children, but, you should know that genetic proximity and close blood relation often results in healthwise low quality offsprings( whether in humans or any other living beings). As Reshmi pointed out, complications arise while conception also.
This practice may be social approval, and as you correctly pointed out even Sati had social approval. Does that mean that we have to accept them? Rather we should evaluate the flawed social perceptions and correct them to the extent we can.
Johar, mass self immolation to save the honour, also did not have any religious sanctity.
Marrying the female of maternal side is a socially acceptable custom in South India, West India specially Maharashtra: and is frowned upon in East India, and unthinkable in Central and North India. The custom has religious sanctity from the times of Mahabharat days or earlier.
When Government of Maharashtra is proposing to legalise live in relationships; the attitude of certain people at instablogs is not understood.
For that matter, how would you feel if you are asked to marry your niece or cousin Mr. Balam? Sorry for posing this question again, but I am asking this question once again because I want you to experience how a person in that particular situation would feel.
You can ask the question thousand times or as many times as you wish. It is your annd my personal choice.
The pertinent question is whether the custom is bad or not. If yes, then how, why and what are the remedial measures and practical alternatives available to the society?
It does not become bad in South India just because North Indians don’t approve of it. That simply is my point.
As far as I know , people from the same gotra are prohibitted from being married because they are believed to be descendents of the same rishi like bharadwaj, vashishist etc. which makes them brother and sister.
My sister’s friend has married (arrainged) to her maternal uncle’s son. They are highly educated and live in US.
Well, so the ultimate reason behind all this is dowry? Thanks for insight.
Being a south indian myself I respect my culture in a lot of ways. But, its just that when someone is meant to be an uncle, psychologically you cannot imagine him as your spouse. Same goes with cousins also. you grow up with them, they are like your brothers.
http://leenakomarraju.instablogs.com/entry/the-south-indian-custom-of-marrying-maternal-uncles-a-further-viewpoint/
Even animals don't mate with close relatives. They avoid it as much as possible. Due to extensive depletion of wildlife in many parts of the world, many species have chosen to inbreed when survival is at stake like the cheetahs in Africa. They now face a bleak future.
Here, I would like to share what I have personally seen. My friend’s dog was given for cross breeding and it produced strong offsprings. After that, a female from the offsprings was mated with the older dog (its father) and three of its five pups died in the first few days of their birth.
Even in the case of marriages within relatives it is seen that offsprings with maternal uncles had more health complications than the ones produced by marrying cousins.
While the grandparents are happy, the couples in the current generations I see in most of the situations are not happy coz they want to look for the spouses from outside of their family network.
Global Opinions (15)
Who told you that marrying within relatives produces handicapped children?
It doesn't, but inbreeding means that it shuts the door on genetic enhancement and increases the chances of keeping inherited genetic shortcomings within the family. This is science.
The term "blue blood" for aristocracy comes from the 'defective' blood (or blood related defects/deficiencies/ailments) that were found to be rampant in such families all over Europe.
Home

Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Stumble Upon
Technorati
Mixx
Sphinn
Twitter
SphereIt
Propeller
Gmarks
Newsvine
Yahoo! My Web
Live Journal
Blinklist
E-mail
RSS 
















